MedCenter One Health Systems, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, etc.


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: DIANA E. MURPHY, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and DUANE BENTON. Duane Benton, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3759453] [10-1377]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 February 25, 2011 Mr. Henry Charles Whitaker U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Civil Division, Appellate Staff 7256 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530-0001 RE: 10-1377 MedCenter One Health Systems, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, etc. Dear Counsel: The court today issued an opinion in this case. Judgment in accordance with the opinion was also entered today. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court DMS Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Robert Ansley Mr. John Philip Borger Ms. Patricia L. Bossert Ms. Colleen M. Faddick Mr. Thomas Jeffrey Fitzgerald Ms. Shon Hastings Mr. Michael Raab Mr. James Patrick Thomas Ms. Marie Elizabeth Williams District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 1:08-cv-00063-DLH Appellate Case: 10-1377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2011 Entry ID: 3759453

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?