Tony Alamo Christian etc., et al v. John Selig, et al


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: JAMES B. LOKEN, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and SUSAN RICHARD NELSON. Susan Richard Nelson, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3867761] [10-1424]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court January 11, 2012 Mr. John Wesley Hall Jr. JOHN WESLEY HALL, JR., P.C. 1202 Main Street Suite 210 Little Rock, AR 72202-5057 RE: 10-1424 Tony Alamo Christian etc., et al v. John Selig, et al Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. James Edward Brader Jr. Mr. Christopher R. Johnson Mr. Phillip Edward Kuhn Ms. Carmen M. Mosley-Sims Mr. Richard Neil Rosen District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:09-cv-04031-HFB Appellate Case: 10-1424 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2012 Entry ID: 3867761

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?