Jesse Garcia v. Marty Anderson, et al
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________ No. 10-2221 ___________ Jesse Garcia, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Marty C. Anderson, Warden; * Dr. T. Tran; Dr. S. Stanton; * [UNPUBLISHED] Jane Doe; and John Doe, sued * in their individual/official capacities, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: November 2, 2010 Filed: November 17, 2010 ___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jesse Garcia appeals following the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Having conducted de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was warranted. See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009) (summary judgment standard of review); see also Melford Olsen Honey, Inc. v. Adee, 452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing de novo district court's application of state law). We also find no abuse of discretion in the denial of Garcia's motion to alter or amend judgment. See Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan, 462 F.3d 913, 920 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?