Curtis Neeley, Jr. v. NameMedia, et al

Filing 30

MOTION to withdraw petition for rehearing., filed by Party Mr. Curtis James Neeley, Jr.. w/service 08/23/2010. [3696246] [10-2255] (CJN)

Curtis Neeley, Jr. v. NameMedia, et al

Doc. 30

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CURTIS J NEELEY JR, MFA VS

CASE NO. 5:09-cv-05151-JLH
NameMedia Inc. Network Solutions Inc. Google Inc.

Dismissal of Motion for Reconsideration
After more closely examining the jurisdictional issues involved, the Plaintiff/Appellant concedes the fact that discretional jurisdiction over pending orders is exclusively reserved for the United States Supreme Court. Plaintiff/Appellant wishes to withdraw the request for reconsideration, rather than waste the time of the Eighth Circuit Court. Plaintiff/Appellant has pleaded to the Supreme Court for an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus and a petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The Supreme Court is the only Court with the supervisory and discretional jurisdiction needed to deal with errors and perpetually pending orders. Plaintiff/Appellant expresses thankfulness for the consideration given already but now agrees that appellate jurisdiction was never proper due to the perpetually pending motions and desires now to dismiss (10-2255).

Respectfully and humbly submitted, s/ Curtis J Neeley Jr. Curtis J Neeley Jr., MFA

Dockets.Justia.com

CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE FOR DOCUMENTS FILED USING CM/ECF
Certificate of Service When All Case Participants Are CM/ECF Participants

I hereby certify that on 7/20/2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit by using the CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.

s/__Curtis J Neeley Jr._________

2