United States v. Russell Frauendorfer
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________ No. 10-2362 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Russell J. Frauendorfer, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: October 26, 2010 Filed: November 5, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Russell Frauendorfer appeals the district court's1 denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment imposing a prison term and restitution in the amount of $4,712. Rule 36 states that "the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission." We hold that the amount of restitution imposed was intended by the district court and not the product of a clerical error or an error arising from oversight or omission. The oral The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
pronouncement of the amount of restitution did not differ from either the written judgment, the criminal complaint, or the presentence report. See United States v. Tramp, 30 F.3d 1035, 1037 (8th Cir. 1994) ("Rule 36 does not authorize a district court to modify a sentence at any time."). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and we deny Frauendorfer's motion to supplement the record, see Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993). ______________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?