Vernis Farmer v. United States, et al
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: STEVEN M. COLLOTON, JAMES B. LOKEN and DIANA E. MURPHY (UNPUBLISHED); denying [3709387-2] pending motion filed by Vernis Farmer.  [10-2491]
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
* Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
United States of America; John Doe,
#1; John Doe, #2; Jane Doe, #1,
Submitted: April 6, 2011
Filed: April 13, 2011
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Vernis Farmer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action, without
prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review, we conclude
dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bellecourt v.
United States, 994 F.2d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny the pending
motion and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
Appellate Case: 10-2491
Date Filed: 04/13/2011 Entry ID: 3776513
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?