Vernis Farmer v. United States, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: STEVEN M. COLLOTON, JAMES B. LOKEN and DIANA E. MURPHY (UNPUBLISHED); denying [3709387-2] pending motion filed by Vernis Farmer. [3776513] [10-2491]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-2491 ___________ Vernis Farmer, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. United States of America; John Doe, * #1; John Doe, #2; Jane Doe, #1, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: April 6, 2011 Filed: April 13, 2011 ___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Vernis Farmer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bellecourt v. United States, 994 F.2d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Appellate Case: 10-2491 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2011 Entry ID: 3776513

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?