Douglas Bean v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, PASCO M. BOWMAN and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED) [3759406] [10-2821]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-2821 ___________ Douglas W. Bean, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: February 22, 2011 Filed: February 25, 2011 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Douglas W. Bean appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, see Van Vickle v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 825, 828 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2008), we find that the administrative law judge’s credibility determination is entitled to deference, see Halverson v. Astrue, 600 F.3d 922, 932 (8th Cir. 2010). We reject as meritless Bean’s 1 The Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Appellate Case: 10-2821 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2011 Entry ID: 3759406 remaining arguments for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 10-2821 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2011 Entry ID: 3759406

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?