EEOC v. Schwan's Home Service


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: LAVENSKI R. SMITH, MORRIS S. ARNOLD and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD. Bobby E. Shepherd, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3807167] [10-3022]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court July 13, 2011 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 10-3022 EEOC v. Schwan's Home Service Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was William Michael Hart, of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Damon L. Highly of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Julie Loraine Gantz, EEOC, Office of General Counsel, of Washington, DC. Counsel who filed a brief Amici Curiae for The Equal Employment Advisory Council, National Association of Manufacturers and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of Appellant were Quinten Riegel, National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC; Rae T. Vann and Laura A. Giantris of Washington, DC for Equal Employment Advisory Council; Robin S. Conrad and Shane B. Kawka of Washington, DC for National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., for Chamber of Commerce of USA. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable John R. Tunheim. The judgment of the district court was entered on June 30, 2010. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CMD Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly Appellate Case: 10-3022 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Entry ID: 3807167 District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:09-mc-00084-JRT Appellate Case: 10-3022 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Entry ID: 3807167

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?