EEOC v. Schwan's Home Service
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: LAVENSKI R. SMITH, MORRIS S. ARNOLD and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD. Bobby E. Shepherd, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3807167] [10-3022]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
July 13, 2011
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 10-3022 EEOC v. Schwan's Home Service
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was William Michael Hart,
of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Damon L.
Highly of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Julie Loraine Gantz,
EEOC, Office of General Counsel, of Washington, DC.
Counsel who filed a brief Amici Curiae for The Equal Employment Advisory Council,
National Association of Manufacturers and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of
America in support of Appellant were Quinten Riegel, National Association of Manufacturers,
Washington, DC; Rae T. Vann and Laura A. Giantris of Washington, DC for Equal Employment
Advisory Council; Robin S. Conrad and Shane B. Kawka of Washington, DC for National
Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., for Chamber of Commerce of USA.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable John R. Tunheim. The
judgment of the district court was entered on June 30, 2010.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
CMD
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 10-3022
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Entry ID: 3807167
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:09-mc-00084-JRT
Appellate Case: 10-3022
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Entry ID: 3807167
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?