United States v. Lucio Adonay Melendez
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: MICHAEL J. MELLOY, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and DUANE BENTON (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [3738893-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Richard J. Henderson.  [10-3616]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov
March 16, 2011
Mr. Richard J. Henderson FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE 112 Roberts Street, N. Suite 200, Federal Square Fargo, ND 58102-0000 RE: 10-3616 United States v. Lucio Adonay Melendez Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CMD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Robert Ansley Mr. Nicholas Whitney Chase Mr. Lucio Adonay Melendez District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 3:10-cr-00112-RRE-1
Appellate Case: 10-3616
Date Filed: 03/16/2011 Entry ID: 3767145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?