Derrick Johnson v. Richard Jackson

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, PASCO M. BOWMAN and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED) [3771579] [10-3640]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-3640 ___________ Derrick Dewayne Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Richard Jackson, Deputy, Pulaski * County Jail (originally sued as * [UNPUBLISHED] R. Jackson), * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: March 25, 2011 Filed: March 30, 2011 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Derrick Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, following an evidentiary hearing, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he claimed that defendant used excessive force against him in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Appellate Case: 10-3640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/30/2011 Entry ID: 3771579 Following careful review, we conclude that no Eighth Amendment violation occurred for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Shields, 207 F.3d 491, 495 (8th Cir. 2000) (in excessive-force claim, core inquiry is whether force was applied in good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously or sadistically to cause harm); Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373 & n.1 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 10-3640 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/30/2011 Entry ID: 3771579

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?