Ahmed Ajaj v. Communications Data Services, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED); denying [3798972-2] motion take judicial notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ahmed Mohammed Ajaj., denying [3798915-2] motion take judicial notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ahmed Mohammed Ajaj.; denying [3792553-2] motion to strike filed by Appellant Mr. Ahmed Mohammed Ajaj., denying [3789084-2] motion to strike filed by Appellant Mr. Ahmed Mohammed Ajaj. [3815502] [11-1090]

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 11-1090
___________
Ahmed Mohammed Ajaj,

*
*
Appellant,
*
*
v.
* Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Communications Data Services, Inc.; * Southern District of Iowa.
United States of America; Malcolm
*
Netburn; Michael Atwood; Karla
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Butler; Harley Lappin; Federal Bureau *
of Prisons; John Doe, #1; John Doe,
*
#2; John Doe, #3; John Doe, #4,
*
*
Appellees.
*
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2011
Filed: August 8, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ahmed Ajaj appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his civil rights action,
in part without prejudice. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that
dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.

Appellate Case: 11-1090

Page: 1

Date Filed: 08/08/2011 Entry ID: 3815502

We further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to
appoint Ajaj counsel. See Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and deny as moot Ajaj’s pending motions.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 11-1090

Page: 2

Date Filed: 08/08/2011 Entry ID: 3815502