Dale Adams v. Tyson Food


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: DIANA E. MURPHY, MORRIS S. ARNOLD and DUANE BENTON (UNPUBLISHED); denying [3816920-2] motion for sanction filed by Appellant Mr. Dale Brent Adams.; denying [3800362-2] motion injunction pending appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Dale Brent Adams. [3837014] [11-1625]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court October 07, 2011 Mr. Dale Brent Adams 2313 Anvil Drive Harrison, AR 72601 RE: 11-1625 Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods Dear Mr. Adams: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court LMT Enclosure(s) cc: Ms. Kathlyn Graves Mr. Christopher R. Johnson Mr. Robert Kopp District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 3:09-cv-03054-JLH Appellate Case: 11-1625 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2011 Entry ID: 3837014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?