Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar v. Warden Brian Jett
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN and PASCO M. BOWMAN and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED); denying Akbar's motion for release and motion to expedite [3801859-2] [3794972-2] [3804168] [11-1642]
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-1642
___________
Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar,
Appellant,
v.
Warden Brian Jett,
Appellee.
*
*
*
* Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
*
* [UNPUBLISHED]
*
___________
Submitted: June 29, 2011
Filed: July 5, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar appeals the district court’s1
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful
review, we conclude that Akbar was not entitled to habeas relief for the reasons relied
upon by the district court. See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951
(8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard
Nelson, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United
States District Judge.
Appellate Case: 11-1642
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/05/2011 Entry ID: 3804168
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Akbar’s motion for release and motion
to expedite.
______________________________
2
-2-
Appellate Case: 11-1642
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/05/2011 Entry ID: 3804168
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?