Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar v. Warden Brian Jett


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN and PASCO M. BOWMAN and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED); denying Akbar's motion for release and motion to expedite [3801859-2] [3794972-2] [3804168] [11-1642]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1642 ___________ Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar, Appellant, v. Warden Brian Jett, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: June 29, 2011 Filed: July 5, 2011 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review, we conclude that Akbar was not entitled to habeas relief for the reasons relied upon by the district court. See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge. Appellate Case: 11-1642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2011 Entry ID: 3804168 affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Akbar’s motion for release and motion to expedite. ______________________________ 2 -2- Appellate Case: 11-1642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2011 Entry ID: 3804168

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?