Matt Padavich v. Hartford Life Insurance Co., et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED) [3848166] [11-1814]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1814 ___________ Matt Padavich, personal representative of Christopher Padavich as beneficiary of Life Insurance Policy on the Life of Virginia Padavich, * * * * * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Hartford Life Insurance Company, * Successor Continental Casualty * Company; U.S. Bank, Successor * Firstar; Affinion Benefits Group, LLC, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: November 1, 2011 Filed: November 10, 2011 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 11-1814 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2011 Entry ID: 3848166 Matt Padavich appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment, in which the court concluded that his son’s estate was not entitled to the benefits of a life insurance policy under which the son had been a beneficiary, because it was beyond genuine dispute that the policy had been cancelled prior to the insured’s death. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ arguments on appeal, and de novo review of the evidence that was before the district court, see Raines v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 637 F.3d 872, 875 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review), we conclude that no genuine issue of material fact remained and defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2- Appellate Case: 11-1814 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2011 Entry ID: 3848166

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?