Lewis Brothers Bakeries v. Interstate Brands Corporation

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Roger L. Wollman, James B. Loken, Diana E. Murphy, Kermit E. Bye, Lavenski R. Smith, Steven M. Colloton, Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton, Bobby E. Shepherd and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Steven M. Colloton (PUBLISHED), CONCUR IN PART AND DISSENT IN PART BY: KERMIT E. BYE, with whom LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JANE KELLY join; [4075440-2] motion to dismiss case filed by Mr. Paul M. Hoffmann is denied as moot. [4162041] [11-1850]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court June 06, 2014 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 11-1850 Lewis Brothers Bakeries v. Interstate Brands Corporation Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument to the court en banc on behalf of the appellant was J. Mark Fisher, of Chicago, IL. Counsel who presented argument to the court en banc on behalf of the appellee was Paul M. Hoffmann, of Kansas City, MO. Counsel who presented argument to the court en banc on behalf of the amicus parties was Adam D. Chandler, of Washington, DC. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable David Gregory Kays. The judgment of the district court was entered on March 21, 2011. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:10-cv-00611-DGK Appellate Case: 11-1850 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2014 Entry ID: 4162041

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?