Juan Leon v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED) [3885324] [11-2006]
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2006
___________
Juan Tomas Leon,
*
*
Petitioner,
*
* Petition for Review of an
v.
* Order of the
* Board of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
*
of the United States,
* [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent.
*
___________
Submitted: February 27, 2012
Filed: March 1, 2012
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Juan Tomas Leon petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial
of withholding of removal.1 We conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s
determination that Leon failed to show it was more likely than not that he would be
1
Leon also pursued asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture, but
he does not address these claims in his brief; thus, they are waived. See
Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (appellant waives
claim that is not meaningfully raised in opening brief).
Appellate Case: 11-2006
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Entry ID: 3885324
persecuted on account of a protected ground if returned to Guatemala. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1231(b)(3) (alien may not be removed to county if alien’s life or freedom would be
threatened in that country because of race, religion, nationality, membership in
particular social group, or political opinion); Wijono v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 868, 872
(8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; applicant for withholding of removal has burden
to show clear probability of persecution, which is same as showing persecution is
more likely than not to occur).
Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 11-2006
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Entry ID: 3885324
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?