Steven Blair v. City of Omaha, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: JAMES B. LOKEN, PASCO M. BOWMAN and DUANE BENTON (UNPUBLISHED); We deny all pending motions [3817657-2]; [3869355-2]. [3892874] [11-2014]

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 11-2014
___________
Steven R. Blair,
Appellant,
v.
City of Omaha, et al.,
Appellees,

*
*
* Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
*
*
[UNPUBLISHED]
*
*
*
___________
Submitted: February 15, 2012
Filed: March 22, 2012
___________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Steven Blair appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of two private individuals,
Patty Dory and Lori Anzaldo, who were named as defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action.2 After careful review, we conclude that the claims in question are precluded
1

The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge
for the District of Nebraska.
2

Dory and Anzaldo were incorrectly identified in the case caption as district
court judges. We previously summarily affirmed the dismissal of two other
defendants, and Blair waived his claims against the remaining appellees.

Appellate Case: 11-2014

Page: 1

Date Filed: 03/22/2012 Entry ID: 3892874

by the doctrine of res judicata, as these defendants were dismissed with prejudice in
a prior action brought by Blair. Blair v. Anderson, D. Neb. No. 4:04-cv-03229, R.
Docs. No. 42, 57. Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions.
_________________________________

- 2-

Appellate Case: 11-2014

Page: 2

Date Filed: 03/22/2012 Entry ID: 3892874