Steven Blair v. City of Omaha, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: JAMES B. LOKEN, PASCO M. BOWMAN and DUANE BENTON (UNPUBLISHED); We deny all pending motions [3817657-2]; [3869355-2]. [3892874] [11-2014]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-2014 ___________ Steven R. Blair, Appellant, v. City of Omaha, et al., Appellees, * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * * ___________ Submitted: February 15, 2012 Filed: March 22, 2012 ___________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Steven Blair appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of two private individuals, Patty Dory and Lori Anzaldo, who were named as defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.2 After careful review, we conclude that the claims in question are precluded 1 The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 2 Dory and Anzaldo were incorrectly identified in the case caption as district court judges. We previously summarily affirmed the dismissal of two other defendants, and Blair waived his claims against the remaining appellees. Appellate Case: 11-2014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/22/2012 Entry ID: 3892874 by the doctrine of res judicata, as these defendants were dismissed with prejudice in a prior action brought by Blair. Blair v. Anderson, D. Neb. No. 4:04-cv-03229, R. Docs. No. 42, 57. Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions. _________________________________ - 2- Appellate Case: 11-2014 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/22/2012 Entry ID: 3892874

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?