Little Rock School District v. State of Arkansas, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER. Raymond W. Gruender, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3863394] [11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
December 28, 2011
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 11-2130
11-2304
11-2305
11-2336
Little Rock School District v. Lorene Joshua, et al
Lorene Joshua, et al v. Pulaski Cty Special Sch Dist
Alexa Armstrong, et al v. North Little Rock School Dist.
North Little Rock Classroom, et al v. Lorene Joshua, et al
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Little Rock School District in
11-2130 was Christopher Heller, of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the
appellant brief on behalf of Little Rock School District in 11-2130: Christopher Heller, of Little
Rock, AR, Clay Fendley, Jr., of Little Rock, AR.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant North Little Rock School
District in 11-2305 was Stephen W. Jones, of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s)
appeared on the appellant brief on behalf of North Little Rock School District in 11-2305:
Stephen W. Jones, of Little Rock, AR, Debby A. Linton, of Little Rock, AR and Mika Shadid
Tucker of Little Rock, AR.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Pulaski County Special
School District in 11-2304 was M. Samuel Jones, III of Little Rock, AR. The following
attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief on behalf of Pulaski County Special School District in
11-2304: Mr. Samuel Jones, III of Little Rock, AR.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees State of Arkansas (11-2130
and 11-2336) and Arkansas Department of Education (11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336) was
Scott Paris Richardson of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee
brief on behalf of State of Arkansas: Scott P. Richardson, of Little Rock, AR, Ali M. Brady, of
Little Rock, AR.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees Lesli Joshua, Stacy Joshua,
Lorene Joshua and Wayne Joshua (11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336), Appellees Tatia
Hudson, Alvin Hudson, Hilton Taylor, Alexa Armstrong, Sara Matthews, John M. Miles, Janice
Appellate Case: 11-2130
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/28/2011 Entry ID: 3863394
Miles, Brian Taylor, Derrick Miles, Robert Willingham, Khayyam Davis, NAACP, Parsha
Taylor, Karlos Armstrong, Ms. Donna Stone and Dennis Stone (11-2305) was Damon Hewitt of
New York, NY. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief on behalf of Lesli
Joshua, Stacy Joshua, Lorene Joshua and Wayne Joshua, Tatia Hudson, Alvin Hudson, Hilton
Taylor, Alexa Armstrong, Sara Matthews, John M. Miles, Janice Miles, Brian Taylor, Derrick
Miles, Robert Willingham, Khayyam Davis, NAACP, Parsha Taylor, Karlos Armstrong, Ms.
Donna Stone and Dennis Stone: Damon T. Hewitt of New York, NY, John Payton of New York,
NY, Debo P. Adegbile of New York, NY, Elise C. Boddie of New York, NY, Rachel M.
Kleinman of New York, NY, John Walker of Little Rock, AR, Robert Pressman of Lexington,
MA, Austin Porter of Little Rock, AR.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Brian S. Miller. The
judgment of the district court was entered on May 19, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LAB
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:82-cv-00866-BSM
4:82-cv-00866-BSM
4:82-cv-00866-BSM
4:82-cv-00866-BSM
Appellate Case: 11-2130
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/28/2011 Entry ID: 3863394
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?