Little Rock School District v. State of Arkansas, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER. Raymond W. Gruender, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3863394] [11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court December 28, 2011 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 11-2130 11-2304 11-2305 11-2336 Little Rock School District v. Lorene Joshua, et al Lorene Joshua, et al v. Pulaski Cty Special Sch Dist Alexa Armstrong, et al v. North Little Rock School Dist. North Little Rock Classroom, et al v. Lorene Joshua, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Little Rock School District in 11-2130 was Christopher Heller, of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief on behalf of Little Rock School District in 11-2130: Christopher Heller, of Little Rock, AR, Clay Fendley, Jr., of Little Rock, AR. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant North Little Rock School District in 11-2305 was Stephen W. Jones, of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief on behalf of North Little Rock School District in 11-2305: Stephen W. Jones, of Little Rock, AR, Debby A. Linton, of Little Rock, AR and Mika Shadid Tucker of Little Rock, AR. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Pulaski County Special School District in 11-2304 was M. Samuel Jones, III of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief on behalf of Pulaski County Special School District in 11-2304: Mr. Samuel Jones, III of Little Rock, AR. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees State of Arkansas (11-2130 and 11-2336) and Arkansas Department of Education (11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336) was Scott Paris Richardson of Little Rock, AR. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief on behalf of State of Arkansas: Scott P. Richardson, of Little Rock, AR, Ali M. Brady, of Little Rock, AR. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees Lesli Joshua, Stacy Joshua, Lorene Joshua and Wayne Joshua (11-2130, 11-2304, 11-2305, 11-2336), Appellees Tatia Hudson, Alvin Hudson, Hilton Taylor, Alexa Armstrong, Sara Matthews, John M. Miles, Janice Appellate Case: 11-2130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2011 Entry ID: 3863394 Miles, Brian Taylor, Derrick Miles, Robert Willingham, Khayyam Davis, NAACP, Parsha Taylor, Karlos Armstrong, Ms. Donna Stone and Dennis Stone (11-2305) was Damon Hewitt of New York, NY. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief on behalf of Lesli Joshua, Stacy Joshua, Lorene Joshua and Wayne Joshua, Tatia Hudson, Alvin Hudson, Hilton Taylor, Alexa Armstrong, Sara Matthews, John M. Miles, Janice Miles, Brian Taylor, Derrick Miles, Robert Willingham, Khayyam Davis, NAACP, Parsha Taylor, Karlos Armstrong, Ms. Donna Stone and Dennis Stone: Damon T. Hewitt of New York, NY, John Payton of New York, NY, Debo P. Adegbile of New York, NY, Elise C. Boddie of New York, NY, Rachel M. Kleinman of New York, NY, John Walker of Little Rock, AR, Robert Pressman of Lexington, MA, Austin Porter of Little Rock, AR. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Brian S. Miller. The judgment of the district court was entered on May 19, 2011. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court LAB Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:82-cv-00866-BSM 4:82-cv-00866-BSM 4:82-cv-00866-BSM 4:82-cv-00866-BSM Appellate Case: 11-2130 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/28/2011 Entry ID: 3863394

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?