Eugene Pitts v. Larry Jegley, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: DIANA E. MURPHY, PASCO M. BOWMAN and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [3808019-2] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Eugene Issac Pitts. [3847035] [11-2306]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court November 07, 2011 Eugene Issac Pitts ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION 073537 Tucker Correctional Facility P.O. Box 240 Tucker, AR 72168-0240 RE: 11-2306 Eugene Pitts v. Larry Jegley, et al Dear Mr. Pitts: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court YML Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Jim McCormack District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:10-cv-01799-SWW Appellate Case: 11-2306 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2011 Entry ID: 3847035

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?