Steven Uhr v. Responsible Hospitality, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: WILLIAM JAY RILEY, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and STEVEN M. COLLOTON (UNPUBLISHED) [3932386] [11-3184]

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 11-3184
___________
Steven E. Uhr,

*
*
Plaintiff - Appellant,
*
*
v.
*
*
Responsible Hospitality Institute, Inc.; *
Jim Peters; Diageo North America, Inc.; *
Gary Zizka; American Beverage
*
Licensees, Inc.; John D. Bodnivich;
*
Distilled Spirits Council of the United *
States, Inc.; Wine and Spirits Whole- *
salers of America, Inc.; International
*
Downtown Association; Applebee's
*
International, Inc.; Famous Dave's of
*
America, Inc.; Chili's of Minnesota,
*
Inc.; Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, *
LLC; Prudential Financial, Inc.;
*
Citibank, N.A.; Richard A. Yoast;
*
James F. Mosher; Robert Bruininks;
*
National Beer Wholesalers Association; *
Richard Lyshek; Rick Petri,
*
*
Defendants - Appellees,
*
*
Jay Wanserski,
*
*
Defendant.
*

Appellate Case: 11-3184

Page: 1

Appeal from the United States
District Court for the
District of Minnesota.
[UNPUBLISHED]

Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Entry ID: 3932386

___________
Submitted: May 15, 2012
Filed: July 17, 2012
___________
Before RILEY, Chief Judge, SMITH and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Steven E. Uhr appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States
District Court1 for the District of Minnesota granting the 22 named defendants'
motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In his
second amended complaint, Uhr alleged that the defendants engaged in a nationwide
price-fixing conspiracy to eliminate happy hours and other drink specials. According
to Uhr, the defendants' alleged acts gave rise to claims under the Sherman Act, 15
U.S.C. § 1, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18
U.S.C. § 1962(c). The district court concluded that the second amended complaint
failed to properly allege the existence of a conspiracy or any predicate acts of
racketeering activity. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal
principles, we find no error in the district court's disposition of this matter.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).
______________________________

1

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-

Appellate Case: 11-3184

Page: 2

Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Entry ID: 3932386