Christopher Baldwin v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and LAVENSKI R. SMITH (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [3892383-2] motion to supplement record filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Baldwin. [3921822] [11-3460]

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 11-3460
___________
Christopher Baldwin,

*
*
Appellant,
*
* Appeal from the United States
v.
* District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Harley Davidson Motor Company
*
Group, Inc.,
* [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee.
*
___________
Submitted: June 11, 2012
Filed: June 14, 2012
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this action claiming employment-related discrimination and retaliation,
Christopher Baldwin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment.
Upon careful de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031,
1042 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 513 (2011), we conclude that the
grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.

Appellate Case: 11-3460

Page: 1

Date Filed: 06/14/2012 Entry ID: 3921822

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also deny Baldwin’s pending motion.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 11-3460

Page: 2

Date Filed: 06/14/2012 Entry ID: 3921822