Interlachen Harriet Investment v. Douglas A. Kelley, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: CHARLES L. NAIL, JR., BARRY S. SCHERMER and JERRY W. VENTERS. Jerry Venters, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3819940] [11-6013]

Download PDF
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, 24th Floor St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2430 FAX (314) 244-2431 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Panel Clerk August 19, 2011 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 11-6013 Interlachen Harriet Investment v. Douglas A. Kelley, et al To Whomever It May Concern: Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of this Panel filed as noted. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Steven John Heim, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; J. David Jackson, of Minneapolis, MN., Mark J. Kalla, of Minneapolis, MN., Pamela Foohey, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee Douglas Arthur Kelley was James A. Lodoen, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the brief of Douglas Kelley: Daryle L. Uphoff, of Minneapolis, MN., and Bryan R. Freeman, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on Behalf of appellee Asset Based Resource Group was Michael A. Rosow, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the brief of appellee Asset Based Resource Group: Thomas Henry Boyd, of Minneapolis, MN., and Daniel Beck, of Minneapolis, MN. The judge who heard the case in the bankruptcy court was the Honorable Gregory F. Kishel. The judgment of the bankruptcy court was entered on February 9, 2011. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Panel Clerk CAH Enclosure(s) Bankruptcy Court Case Number(s): 08-45257 Appellate Case: 11-6013 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2011 Entry ID: 3819940

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?