Interlachen Harriet Investment v. Douglas A. Kelley, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: CHARLES L. NAIL, JR., BARRY S. SCHERMER and JERRY W. VENTERS. Jerry Venters, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3819940] [11-6013]
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, 24th Floor
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2430
FAX (314) 244-2431
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Panel Clerk
August 19, 2011
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 11-6013 Interlachen Harriet Investment v. Douglas A. Kelley, et al
To Whomever It May Concern:
Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of this Panel filed as noted.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Steven John Heim, of
Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; J.
David Jackson, of Minneapolis, MN., Mark J. Kalla, of Minneapolis, MN., Pamela Foohey,
of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee Douglas Arthur Kelley was
James A. Lodoen, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the
brief of Douglas Kelley: Daryle L. Uphoff, of Minneapolis, MN., and Bryan R. Freeman,
of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on Behalf of appellee Asset Based Resource Group was
Michael A. Rosow, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition, the following attorney(s) appeared on the
brief of appellee Asset Based Resource Group: Thomas Henry Boyd,
of Minneapolis, MN., and Daniel Beck, of Minneapolis, MN.
The judge who heard the case in the bankruptcy court was the Honorable Gregory F. Kishel. The
judgment of the bankruptcy court was entered on February 9, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Panel Clerk
CAH
Enclosure(s)
Bankruptcy Court Case Number(s): 08-45257
Appellate Case: 11-6013
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/19/2011 Entry ID: 3819940
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?