United States v. Douglas Larew

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: KERMIT E. BYE, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [3884170-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. George E. Grassby. [3929541] [12-1171]

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 12-1171
___________
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
Douglas Larew,
Appellant.

*
*
*
* Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
*
* [UNPUBLISHED]
*
___________
Submitted: June 21, 2012
Filed: July 9, 2012
___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Douglas Larew appeals the two-year prison sentence the district court1 imposed
after revoking his probation. Upon careful review of the entire sentencing record, we
conclude that the court committed no significant procedural error, adequately
explained the reasons for the sentence, and imposed a substantively reasonable
sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir. 2009); United
States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008). We also conclude the
court did not err by reimposing the schedule for his restitution payments: the court
1

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota.

Appellate Case: 12-1171

Page: 1

Date Filed: 07/09/2012 Entry ID: 3929541

was aware of his financial history, the monthly payments are not especially high, and
Larew never sought to modify the payment schedule. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k); cf.
United States v. Johnson, 327 F.3d 758, 759 (8th Cir. 2003).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 12-1171

Page: 2

Date Filed: 07/09/2012 Entry ID: 3929541