United States v. Douglas Larew


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: KERMIT E. BYE, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [3884170-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. George E. Grassby. [3929541] [12-1171]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 12-1171 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Douglas Larew, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: June 21, 2012 Filed: July 9, 2012 ___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Douglas Larew appeals the two-year prison sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his probation. Upon careful review of the entire sentencing record, we conclude that the court committed no significant procedural error, adequately explained the reasons for the sentence, and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir. 2009); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008). We also conclude the court did not err by reimposing the schedule for his restitution payments: the court 1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. Appellate Case: 12-1171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2012 Entry ID: 3929541 was aware of his financial history, the monthly payments are not especially high, and Larew never sought to modify the payment schedule. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k); cf. United States v. Johnson, 327 F.3d 758, 759 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 12-1171 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2012 Entry ID: 3929541

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?