Dittmer Properties v. FDIC, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, C. Arlen Beam and Diana E. Murphy AUTHORING JUDGE:C. Arlen Beam (PUBLISHED); [3936300-2] Denying CADC's motion to dismiss the appeal, and dismiss appellants' motion to amend the statement of issues as moot. [4008860] [12-1327, 12-1329]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court February 27, 2013 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 12-1327 Dittmer Properties v. FDIC, et al. 12-1329 Buford Farrington, et al v. Cathy Richards, et al. Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above cases. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellants was Thomas M. Schneider, of Columbia, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellants’ brief; Thomas M. Schneider, of Columbia, MO. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees was William L. Sauerwein, of Saint Louis, MO. In addition to Mr. Sauerwein, the following attorney(s) appeared on the appellees’ brief; Michael C. Schroer of Saint Louis, MO., Anne Johnston Kelly, of Saint Louis, MO. The judge who heard the case number 12-1327 in the district court was Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan. The judge who heard the case number 12-1329 in the district court was Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey. The judgments of the district court were entered on January 27, 2012. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court LMT Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:11-cv-04011-FJG Appellate Case: 12-1327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2013 Entry ID: 4008860 2:11-cv-04252-FJG Appellate Case: 12-1327 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2013 Entry ID: 4008860

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?