Dittmer Properties v. FDIC, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, C. Arlen Beam and Diana E. Murphy AUTHORING JUDGE:C. Arlen Beam (PUBLISHED); [3936300-2] Denying CADC's motion to dismiss the appeal, and dismiss appellants' motion to amend the statement of issues as moot. [4008860] [12-1327, 12-1329]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
February 27, 2013
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-1327 Dittmer Properties v. FDIC, et al.
12-1329 Buford Farrington, et al v. Cathy Richards, et al.
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellants was Thomas M. Schneider,
of Columbia, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellants’ brief; Thomas M.
Schneider, of Columbia, MO.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees was William L. Sauerwein,
of Saint Louis, MO. In addition to Mr. Sauerwein, the following attorney(s) appeared on the
appellees’ brief; Michael C. Schroer of Saint Louis, MO., Anne Johnston Kelly, of Saint
Louis, MO.
The judge who heard the case number 12-1327 in the district court was
Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan. The judge who heard the case number 12-1329 in the district
court was Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey. The judgments of the district court were entered on
January 27, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LMT
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:11-cv-04011-FJG
Appellate Case: 12-1327
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/27/2013 Entry ID: 4008860
2:11-cv-04252-FJG
Appellate Case: 12-1327
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/27/2013 Entry ID: 4008860
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?