Rick D. Lange, et al v. Mutual of Omaha Bank
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Duane Benton and Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [3978821] [12-1390]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-1390
___________________________
In re: Negus-Sons, Inc.
Debtor
-----------------------------Rick D. Lange
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
v.
Mutual of Omaha Bank
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
United States Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Contractors, Laborers,
Teamsters and Engineers Pension Plan; Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and
Engineers Health and Welfare Plan; International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local No. 571
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellees
____________
Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy
Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
____________
Submitted: November 15, 2012
Filed: November 28, 2012
____________
Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
Appellate Case: 12-1390
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/28/2012 Entry ID: 3978821
PER CURIAM.
The bankruptcy court1 granted summary judgment to the trustee of debtor
Negus-Sons, Inc. In re Negus-Sons, Inc., BK09-82518, 2011 WL 2470478 (Bankr.
D. Neb. June 20, 2011). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re NegusSons, Inc., 460 B.R. 754, 759 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2011). Mutual of Omaha Bank, a
claimant, appeals. This court reviews the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear
error and reviews de novo the legal conclusions of the bankruptcy court and the BAP.
In re Payless Cashways, Inc., 394 F.3d 1082, 1083 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). For
the reasons stated by the BAP, this court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Timothy J. Mahoney, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
-2Appellate Case: 12-1390
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/28/2012 Entry ID: 3978821
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?