Rick D. Lange, et al v. Mutual of Omaha Bank


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Duane Benton and Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [3978821] [12-1390]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-1390 ___________________________ In re: Negus-Sons, Inc. Debtor -----------------------------Rick D. Lange lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee v. Mutual of Omaha Bank lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant United States Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Pension Plan; Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Health and Welfare Plan; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 571 lllllllllllllllllllllAppellees ____________ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit ____________ Submitted: November 15, 2012 Filed: November 28, 2012 ____________ Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ Appellate Case: 12-1390 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2012 Entry ID: 3978821 PER CURIAM. The bankruptcy court1 granted summary judgment to the trustee of debtor Negus-Sons, Inc. In re Negus-Sons, Inc., BK09-82518, 2011 WL 2470478 (Bankr. D. Neb. June 20, 2011). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re NegusSons, Inc., 460 B.R. 754, 759 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2011). Mutual of Omaha Bank, a claimant, appeals. This court reviews the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error and reviews de novo the legal conclusions of the bankruptcy court and the BAP. In re Payless Cashways, Inc., 394 F.3d 1082, 1083 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). For the reasons stated by the BAP, this court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Timothy J. Mahoney, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2Appellate Case: 12-1390 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2012 Entry ID: 3978821

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?