Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender AUTHORING JUDGE:Raymond W. Gruender (PUBLISHED) [3991166] [12-1719]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
January 07, 2013
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-1719 Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Brian N. Woolley, of
Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Robert Kent
Sellers, of Kansas City, MO, and Shelley Ericsson, of Kansas City, MO.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Ryan A. Keane, of Saint
Louis, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; John E Campbell, of Saint
Louis, MO., Ryan A. Keane, of Saint Louis, MO.
The following attorney(s) appeared on the amicus brief in support of appellees by
National Employment Lawyers Association, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law
& Policy, and National Employment Law Project; Douglas Micko,
of Minneapolis, MN., Rebecca M. Hamburg Cappy, of San Francisco, CA.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan. The
judgment of the district court was entered on February 28, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
CMD
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 12-1719
Page: 1
Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991166
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:11-cv-04258-FJG
Appellate Case: 12-1719
Page: 2
Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991166
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?