Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender AUTHORING JUDGE:Raymond W. Gruender (PUBLISHED) [3991166] [12-1719]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court January 07, 2013 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 12-1719 Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc. Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Brian N. Woolley, of Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Robert Kent Sellers, of Kansas City, MO, and Shelley Ericsson, of Kansas City, MO. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Ryan A. Keane, of Saint Louis, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; John E Campbell, of Saint Louis, MO., Ryan A. Keane, of Saint Louis, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the amicus brief in support of appellees by National Employment Lawyers Association, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy, and National Employment Law Project; Douglas Micko, of Minneapolis, MN., Rebecca M. Hamburg Cappy, of San Francisco, CA. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan. The judgment of the district court was entered on February 28, 2012. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CMD Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly Appellate Case: 12-1719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991166 District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:11-cv-04258-FJG Appellate Case: 12-1719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991166

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?