Eric Williams v. Judith Bearden, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Morris S. Arnold and Lavenski R. Smith. Denying [3937721-2] motion to Appellee Carter's brief, disbar attorney Dennis Hansen, reverse and remand filed by Mr. Eric Williams., (UNPUBLISHED) [3980871] [12-1793]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-1793
___________________________
Eric Williams
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Judith Bearden, County of Marion District Court Judge; Kenford O. Carter,
County of Marion Deputy Prosecutor; County of Marion, State of Arkansas
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: November 26, 2012
Filed: December 4, 2012
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 12-1793
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/04/2012 Entry ID: 3980871
Eric Williams appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S.
9 (1991) (per curiam); Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.
Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also
deny the pending motion.
______________________________
1
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
-2-
Appellate Case: 12-1793
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/04/2012 Entry ID: 3980871
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?