Harold Stanley v. CIR


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Michael J. Melloy and Bobby E. Shepherd The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion.; Denying [3948710-2] motion for an order to cease and desist collection activities filed by Mr. Harold R Stanley. [3963495] [12-1914]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court October 15, 2012 Mr. Harold R Stanley P.O. Box 399 Peculiar, MO 64078-0399 RE: 12-1914 Harold Stanley v. CIR Dear Mr. Stanley: The court today issued an opinion in this case. Judgment in accordance with the opinion was also entered today. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CMD Enclosure(s) cc: Ms. Carol Barthel Mr. Thomas J. Clark Mr. Robert R. DiTrolio Mr. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg Ms. Laurie Snyder District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 5096-10 Appellate Case: 12-1914 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2012 Entry ID: 3963495

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?