David Namer v. United State


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman and Steven M. Colloton (UNPUBLISHED) [3951995] [12-1937]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-1937 ___________________________ David I. Namer, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________ Submitted: September 6, 2012 Filed: September 12, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate David Namer appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Upon 1 The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Appellate Case: 12-1937 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2012 Entry ID: 3951995 de novo review, see Meuir v. Greene Cnty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115, 1118 (8th Cir. 2007), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons the district court stated. To the extent Namer challenges any of the district court’s discovery rulings, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion. See id. at 1120. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2Appellate Case: 12-1937 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2012 Entry ID: 3951995

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?