Khalifah Faruq v. Leon Vicker
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Lavenski R. Smith and Steven M. Colloton (UNPUBLISHED), DISSENT BY: Steven M. Colloton. Denying [3979230-2] motion to expand the record filed by Appellant Mr. Khalifah Abd-al Mubaymin Faruq. [4061765] [12-2192]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
August 05, 2013
Mr. Khalifah Abd-al Mubaymin Faruq
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI CORRECTIONAL CENTER
524486
300 E. Pedro Simmons Drive
Charleston, MO 63834-0000
RE: 12-2192 Khalifah Faruq v. Leon Vickers
Dear Mr. Faruq:
The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance
with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the
opinion in confidence until that time.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period
for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any
petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day
period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LAB
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. John Thaddeus Eckenrode
Ms. Ann Thompson
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:09-cv-04110-NKL
Appellate Case: 12-2192
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Entry ID: 4061765
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?