JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Daniel Johnson, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Michael J. Melloy and Lavenski R. Smith AUTHORING JUDGE: Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4052396] [12-2370, 12-2686, 12-3049]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
July 09, 2013
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-2370 JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Daniel Johnson, et al
12-2686 Jere Jones, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
12-3049 Karen Rivera v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Corey D. McGaha, of
Little Rock, AR. The following attorneys appeared on the appellant brief: Todd M. Turner,
of Arkadelphia, AR., Kathy A. Cruz, of Hot Springs, AR., Scott E. Poynter, of Little
Rock, AR., and Joel G. Hargis, of Jonesboro, AR.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Daniel S. Connolly, of
New York, NY. The following attorneys appeared on the appellee brief: David L. Williams,
of Little Rock, AR., Katherine M. Hingtgen, of Little Rock, AR, and Rachel B. Goldman,
of New York, NY.
The judge who heard the cases in the district court was Honorable J. Leon Holmes. The
judgments of the district court were entered on May 11, 2012, in 12-2370; on June 18, 2012, in
12-2686; and, on July 31, 2012, in 12-3049.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
DMS
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 12-2370
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 3:11-cv-00249-JLH
3:11-cv-00250-JLH
3:11-cv-00251-JLH
3:11-cv-00172-JLH
3:11-cv-00198-JLH
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Entry ID: 4052396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?