Carl Lee Eller, et al v. NFL Players Association, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, C. Arlen Beam and Kermit E. Bye. --AUTHORING JUDGE: James B. Loken-- (PUBLISHED) *CONCUR BY: C. Arlen Beam* [4078280] [12-2487]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
September 23, 2013
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-2487 Carl Lee Eller, et al v. NFL Players Association, et al
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Michael D. Hausfeld, of
Washington, DC. The following attorneys appeared on the appellant brief: Mark Feinberg,
of Minneapolis, MN., Thomas B. Caswell, III, of Minneapolis, MN., Michael P. Lehmann,
of San Francisco, CA., Shawn D. Stuckey, of Minneapolis, MN., Kaisa M. Adams,
of Minneapolis, MN., Swathi Bojedla, of Washington, DC., and Daniel S. Mason, of San
Francisco, CA.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Andrew S. Tulumello, of
Washington, DC. The following attorneys appeared on the appellee brief; Jeffrey L. Kessler,
of New York, NY., David Greenspan, of New York, NY., Scott P. Martin of Washington, DC.,
and Misha Tseytlin of Washington, DC.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Susan Richard Nelson.
The judgment of the district court was entered on May 30, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
DMW
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:11-cv-02623-SRN
Appellate Case: 12-2487
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/23/2013 Entry ID: 4078280
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?