Norma Beck v. Brian Moynihan, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Morris S. Arnold and Lavenski R. Smith (UNPUBLISHED) [3970276-2] The motion for for leave to file new and material evidence harrassment and fraud on the court, filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Beck, is hereby denied. [3991188] [12-2582]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2582 ___________________________ Norma Beck lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Brian Moynihan; Bank of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: December 28, 2012 Filed: January 7, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Norma Beck appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) dismissal of her civil complaint without prejudice. Having carefully reviewed the 1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Appellate Case: 12-2582 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991188 record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (court may dismiss action for pro se litigant’s failure to comply with any court order). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Beck’s pending motion. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 12-2582 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991188

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?