Norma Beck v. Brian Moynihan, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Morris S. Arnold and Lavenski R. Smith (UNPUBLISHED) [3970276-2] The motion for for leave to file new and material evidence harrassment and fraud on the court, filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Beck, is hereby denied. [3991188] [12-2582]

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2582
___________________________
Norma Beck
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Brian Moynihan; Bank of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: December 28, 2012
Filed: January 7, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Norma Beck appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)
dismissal of her civil complaint without prejudice. Having carefully reviewed the
1

The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

Appellate Case: 12-2582

Page: 1

Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991188

record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (court may dismiss
action for pro se litigant’s failure to comply with any court order). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Beck’s pending motion.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 12-2582

Page: 2

Date Filed: 01/07/2013 Entry ID: 3991188