Sarojini Daram v. Jeffrey Ptak, M.D., P.C.


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Lavenski R. Smith and Steven M. Colloton (UNPUBLISHED) [4012142] [12-2887]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2887 ___________________________ Sarojini Daram, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Jeffrey J. Ptak, M.D., P.C., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: February 20, 2013 Filed: March 7, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 12-2887 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 Entry ID: 4012142 Sarojini Daram appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her complaint as subject to claim preclusion under Arizona law. Upon our careful review, see C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 695 F.3d 758, 763 (8th Cir. 2012) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss based on res judicata); David v. Tanksley, 218 F.3d 928, 930 (8th Cir. 2000) (de novo review of district court’s interpretation of state law), we affirm for the reasons provided by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Appellate Case: 12-2887 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 Entry ID: 4012142

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?