Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Diana E. Murphy and Lavenski R. Smith AUTHORING JUDGE:Roger L. Wollman (PUBLISHED) [4061301] [12-2946]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court August 02, 2013 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 12-2946 Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellants was Erick G. Kaardal, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of Appellees Mark Ritchie and Lori Swanson was Nathan J. Hartshorn, AAG, of Saint Paul, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of Appellees Joe Mansky and John J. Choi was Robert B. Roche, of Saint Paul, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of Appellees Laureen E. Borden and Donald F. Ryan was Jessica E. Schwie, of Lake Elmo, MN. Also appearing on this brief was Jamie Guderian, of Lake Elmo, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of Appellees Dennis J. Freed and Janet Reiter was Mark K. Hellie, of Lake Elmo, MN. Also appearing on this brief was Jessica E. Schwie, of Lake Elmo, MN. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Donovan W. Frank. The judgment of the district court was entered on August 17, 2012. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court MER Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:12-cv-00519-DWF Appellate Case: 12-2946 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2013 Entry ID: 4061301

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?