Stephen Hodgson v. Tom Roy, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Pasco M. Bowman and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4019670] [12-3018]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3018 ___________________________ Stephen A. Hodgson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Tom Roy; Joan Fabian; John King; Michelle Smith; Joseph Hobson; Bruce Julson; David Reishus; Sheryl Vezner; Greg Lindell; John Doe; Jane Doe, sued in their individual and official capacities lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: March 26, 2013 Filed: March 29, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ Appellate Case: 12-3018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2013 Entry ID: 4019670 PER CURIAM. Stephen Hodgson appeals the district court’s1 judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he claimed, as relevant, that his First Amendment rights were violated when mailroom staff at the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Stillwater confiscated mail sent to him in May 2010. Following careful review, we hold that the district court did not err in granting defendants summary judgment. See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009) (de novo review of summary judgment). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the district court’s denial of Hodgson’s motion for a temporary restraining order. See Hamm v. Groose, 15 F.3d 110, 112-13 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Appellate Case: 12-3018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2013 Entry ID: 4019670

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?