Lloyd Meeks v. United State
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Kermit E. Bye and Lavenski R. Smith AUTHORING JUDGE:Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4122783] [12-3726, 12-3914]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
February 11, 2014
Mr. Art Fleak
P.O. Box 582033
Tulsa, OK 74158
Mr. Murray Kamionski
100
1334 Parkview Avenue
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
RE: 12-3726 Lloyd Meeks v. United States
12-3914 Douglas Meeks v. United States
Dear Counsel:
The court today issued an opinion in these cases. Judgment in accordance with the
opinion was also entered today.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period
for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any
petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day
period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LMT
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. Andrew H. Kahl
Ms. Marjorie Krahn
Ms. Mary Clare Luxa
Mr. Douglas Marcel Meeks
Mr. Lloyd D. Meeks
Mr. Richard D. Westphal
Appellate Case: 12-3726
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Entry ID: 4122783
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:12-cv-00444-JAJ
4:12-cv-00489-JAJ
Appellate Case: 12-3726
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Entry ID: 4122783
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?