United States v. Jeffrey Cole Bennett
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender AUTHORING JUDGE:Raymond W. Gruender (PUBLISHED), CONCUR AND DISSENT BY: C. ARLEN BEAM [4191159] [12-3754, 13-1109, 13-2038]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
August 29, 2014
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-3754 United States v. Jeffrey Cole Bennett
13-1109 United States v. Jennifer Rose Hogeland
13-2038 United States v. Clayton Craig Hogeland
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of appellant Jeffrey Bennett was Nadia
Wood, of Saint Paul, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of appellant Jennifer Hogeland was David
Gerdtz of Minneapolis, MN.
The following attorney appeared on the brief of appellant Clayton Hogeland; John C.
Brink of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was
Timothy Christopher Rank, AUSA, of Minneapolis, MN.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz. The
judgment of the district court in appeal 12-3754 was entered on November 13, 2012. The
judgment of the district court in appeal 13-1109 was entered on January 10, 2013. The judgment
of the district court in appeal 13-2038 was entered on May 3, 2013
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
MDS
Enclosure(s)
Appellate Case: 12-3754
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Entry ID: 4191159
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:10-cr-00061-PJS-3
0:10-cr-00061-PJS-2
0:10-cr-00061-PJS-1
Appellate Case: 12-3754
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Entry ID: 4191159
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?