Amber Ybarra v. AR Department of Corrections, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Raymond W. Gruender and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) [4065176] [13-1212]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1212
___________________________
Amber Ybarra
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Arkansas Department of Correction; Leroy Hoots, Corporal, McPherson Unit,
ADC; Linda Dixon, Major, McPherson Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville
____________
Submitted: August 12, 2013
Filed: August 15, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 13-1212
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/15/2013 Entry ID: 4065176
Amber Ybarra appeals following the district court’s1 adverse entry of judgment
on a jury verdict in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the
parties’ submissions and the record before us on appeal, we conclude that Ybarra’s
claims are not susceptible to meaningful review because she failed to provide a
transcript of the trial proceedings. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1) (discussing
appellant’s duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners
of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 385–86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (where pro se appellant did
not order trial transcript, appellate court could not review challenges to evidentiary
rulings or to sufficiency of evidence). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-1212
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/15/2013 Entry ID: 4065176
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?