George H. Kalberer v. Teamsters Local 120


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Raymond W. Gruender and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4044033-2] motion for remand filed by Appellant Mr. George H. Kalberer. [4063048] [13-1356]

Download PDF
George H. Kalberer v. Teamsters Local 120 Doc. 812232229 United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1356 ___________________________ George H. Kalberer lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Teamsters Local 120 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: August 1, 2013 Filed: August 8, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. George Kalberer appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action claiming that his former union breached its duty of fair 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. Appellate Case: 13-1356 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Entry ID: 4063048 representation and that it violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The district court concluded that each of Kalberer’s claims was barred by an applicable statute of limitations. Upon careful de novo review, see Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review), we agree with the district court’s conclusions. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Kalberer’s pending motion for “remand.” ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 13-1356 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Entry ID: 4063048

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?