George H. Kalberer v. Teamsters Local 120

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Raymond W. Gruender and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4044033-2] motion for remand filed by Appellant Mr. George H. Kalberer. [4063048] [13-1356]

George H. Kalberer v. Teamsters Local 120

Doc. 812232229

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1356
___________________________
George H. Kalberer
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Teamsters Local 120
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: August 1, 2013
Filed: August 8, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
George Kalberer appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his pro se action claiming that his former union breached its duty of fair
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

Appellate Case: 13-1356

Page: 1

Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Entry ID: 4063048
Dockets.Justia.com

representation and that it violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The
district court concluded that each of Kalberer’s claims was barred by an applicable
statute of limitations. Upon careful de novo review, see Tusing v. Des Moines Indep.
Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review), we agree
with the district court’s conclusions. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also deny Kalberer’s pending motion for “remand.”
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 13-1356

Page: 2

Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Entry ID: 4063048