Raymond Kelley, et al v. Centennial Bank


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Pasco M. Bowman and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4091121] [13-1491]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1491 ___________________________ In re: Raymond Kelley; Karen Patrice Kelley lllllllllllllllllllllDebtors -----------------------------Raymond Kelley; Karen Patrice Kelley lllllllllllllllllllllAppellants v. Centennial Bank lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit ____________ Submitted: October 22, 2013 Filed: October 31, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 13-1491 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Entry ID: 4091121 Raymond and Karen Kelley (the Kelleys) appeal the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s1 order requiring the Kelleys to convey certain parcels of real property to Centennial Bank, pursuant to the Kelleys’ confirmed plan. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we agree with the BAP’s conclusions and find no basis to set aside the bankruptcy court’s order. See In re Ungar, 633 F.3d 675, 678-79 (8th Cir. 2011) (this court applies same standards as BAP, reviewing bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal determinations de novo); In re Dial Bus. Forms, Inc., 341 F.3d 738, 744 (8th Cir. 2003) (bankruptcy court’s interpretation of confirmed plan is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Audrey R. Evans, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Appellate Case: 13-1491 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Entry ID: 4091121

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?