David Stebbins v. Wes Bradford, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Duane Benton, Pasco M. Bowman and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4120260] [13-2689]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-2689
___________________________
David Anthony Stebbins
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Wes Bradford; State of Arkansas; Boone County Circuit Court; Gordon Webb,
Chambers of; David D. Stebbins
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: January 30, 2014
Filed: February 4, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 13-2689
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/04/2014 Entry ID: 4120260
David Stebbins appeals from an order of the District Court1 dismissing his civil
complaint prior to service under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2). Stebbins alleged that
defendants had a motive to steal a missing file in a civil case that he had filed in state
court. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th
Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the District Court properly dismissed the
complaint for failure to state a claim. Stebbins also seeks to challenge the imposition
of certain restrictions on his ability to file complaints in the district court. These
restrictions were imposed in a different case, however, and are not properly before us
in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas, adopting in part the report and recommendations
of the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-2689
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/04/2014 Entry ID: 4120260
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?