LaRonda Phox v. George E. Fern Co., et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Kermit E. Bye and Steven M. Colloton (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4090641-2] motion for court order filed by Appellant Ms. LaRonda Phox. [4129223] [13-2816]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-2816 ___________________________ LaRonda Phox lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. George E. Fern Co., an Ohio corporation; International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 31 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: February 27, 2014 Filed: March 4, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 13-2816 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Entry ID: 4129223 LaRonda Phox appeals following the district court’s1 entry of final judgment in her employment discrimination action. We have carefully considered Phox’s arguments for reversing the numerous orders she identifies on appeal, and we agree with the district court’s disposition of these matters and its underlying analysis, including its denial of her motion for default judgment against George E. Fern Company, see Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai, 351 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir. 2003) (reviewing for abuse of discretion), and its grant of summary judgment to International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 31, see Shaffer v. Potter, 499 F.3d 900, 903 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Phox’s motion for a court order. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Appellate Case: 13-2816 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Entry ID: 4129223

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?