United States v. Brenda Stacker

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Diana E. Murphy and Lavenski R. Smith (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4090373-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Troy K. Stabenow subject to his informing appellant Brenda Ann Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari. [4127762] [13-2989]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-2989 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Brenda Ann Stacker lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________ Submitted: February 21, 2014 Filed: February 27, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Brenda Ann Stacker pleaded guilty to a fraud offense, and was sentenced by the district court1 to 4 years of probation. On appeal, counsel for Stacker seeks to 1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. Appellate Case: 13-2989 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2014 Entry ID: 4127762 withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the court abused its discretion by failing to convert Stacker’s felony conviction into a misdemeanor. We reject this argument as legally unfounded. Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to his informing Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari. The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 13-2989 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2014 Entry ID: 4127762

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?