United States v. Brenda Stacker
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Diana E. Murphy and Lavenski R. Smith (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4090373-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Troy K. Stabenow subject to his informing appellant Brenda Ann Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari. [4127762] [13-2989]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-2989
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Brenda Ann Stacker
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: February 21, 2014
Filed: February 27, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Brenda Ann Stacker pleaded guilty to a fraud offense, and was sentenced by
the district court1 to 4 years of probation. On appeal, counsel for Stacker seeks to
1
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
Appellate Case: 13-2989
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/27/2014 Entry ID: 4127762
withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
arguing that the court abused its discretion by failing to convert Stacker’s felony
conviction into a misdemeanor. We reject this argument as legally unfounded.
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw, subject to his informing Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or
filing a petition for certiorari. The judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-2989
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/27/2014 Entry ID: 4127762
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?