Roscoe Chambers v. Dennis Conard, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Lavenski R. Smith and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4104296] [13-3024]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3024 ___________________________ Roscoe Chambers lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dennis Conard, Sheriff, Scott County Jail; Unknown Glasgow, Scott County Jail; Unknown Walker, Scott County Jail; Sean ONeal, USMS; Unknown Jackson, Scott County Jail; Humes, C/O; Clark, C/O; Kelso, C/O; Jennins, C/O; Broder, Sgt.; Pearce, C/O; Tibbitt, Major; Shedo, C/O; Halter, C/O; Blea, C/O; Lefman, C/O; Bibens, C/O; Bright, C/O; Boyd, Sgt.; Salsberry, Sgt.; Gaudet, Sgt. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: December 4, 2013 Filed: December 11, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 13-3024 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2013 Entry ID: 4104296 Roscoe Chambers appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (complaint must state “more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”; mere conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2- Appellate Case: 13-3024 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2013 Entry ID: 4104296

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?