Roscoe Chambers v. Dennis Conard, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Lavenski R. Smith and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4104296] [13-3024]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3024
___________________________
Roscoe Chambers
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dennis Conard, Sheriff, Scott County Jail; Unknown Glasgow, Scott County Jail;
Unknown Walker, Scott County Jail; Sean ONeal, USMS; Unknown Jackson,
Scott County Jail; Humes, C/O; Clark, C/O; Kelso, C/O; Jennins, C/O; Broder,
Sgt.; Pearce, C/O; Tibbitt, Major; Shedo, C/O; Halter, C/O; Blea, C/O; Lefman,
C/O; Bibens, C/O; Bright, C/O; Boyd, Sgt.; Salsberry, Sgt.; Gaudet, Sgt.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: December 4, 2013
Filed: December 11, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 13-3024
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/11/2013 Entry ID: 4104296
Roscoe Chambers appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice
dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see
Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of
review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could
be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (complaint must state
“more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”; mere
conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the
judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-3024
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/11/2013 Entry ID: 4104296
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?