Paul Norfolk v. Leon Vickers, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Steven M. Colloton and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) The order granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief is rescinded. [4174118] [13-3423]--[Edited 07/11/2014 by LMT]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3423 ___________________________ Paul Norfolk lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Leon Vickers; "Jane Doe" Chandler; Dr. Thomas Baker; Dr. Mullen; Dr. William Rice, MD; Dr. Harry D. Haas, MD; Stormi Moeller; Eric Vogt; Cheryl Clad; Erin Escamille; Angela Laws; John Cook; Dr. Knudsen; Dr. Jane Doe; Dr. John Doe; George Lombardi; Larry Crawford; Dave Dormire; Gale Bailey; Deloise Williams; Stewart Epps; Dr. Michael Sands; Melody Griffith; Jewel Cofield; Corizon, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________ Submitted: July 3, 2014 Filed: July 11, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 13-3423 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174118 Inmate Paul Norfolk appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on the remaining claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful consideration of the matters Norfolk raises on appeal, we find that they provide no basis for overturning the rulings he challenges. The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we rescind the order granting his motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Appellate Case: 13-3423 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174118

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?