Paul Norfolk v. Leon Vickers, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Steven M. Colloton and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) The order granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief is rescinded. [4174118] [13-3423]--[Edited 07/11/2014 by LMT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3423
___________________________
Paul Norfolk
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Leon Vickers; "Jane Doe" Chandler; Dr. Thomas Baker; Dr. Mullen; Dr. William
Rice, MD; Dr. Harry D. Haas, MD; Stormi Moeller; Eric Vogt; Cheryl Clad; Erin
Escamille; Angela Laws; John Cook; Dr. Knudsen; Dr. Jane Doe; Dr. John Doe;
George Lombardi; Larry Crawford; Dave Dormire; Gale Bailey; Deloise Williams;
Stewart Epps; Dr. Michael Sands; Melody Griffith; Jewel Cofield; Corizon, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: July 3, 2014
Filed: July 11, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 13-3423
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174118
Inmate Paul Norfolk appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment on the remaining claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon
careful consideration of the matters Norfolk raises on appeal, we find that they
provide no basis for overturning the rulings he challenges. The judgment of the
district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we rescind the order granting his
motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-3423
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174118
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?