Lennie Senter v. Stericycle, Inc.


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Steven M. Colloton and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) [4174186] [13-3511]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3511 ___________________________ Lennie R. Senter lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Stericycle, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: July 7, 2014 Filed: July 11, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc. 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. Appellate Case: 13-3511 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174186 (Stericycle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met its burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter’s claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VII. See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir. 2009). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 13-3511 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174186

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?