Lennie Senter v. Stericycle, Inc.
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Steven M. Colloton and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) [4174186] [13-3511]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3511
___________________________
Lennie R. Senter
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Stericycle, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: July 7, 2014
Filed: July 11, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc.
1
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Appellate Case: 13-3511
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174186
(Stericycle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met
its burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact, and that it
was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter’s claims that he was subjected
to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation
of Title VII. See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir. 2009). The
judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 13-3511
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/11/2014 Entry ID: 4174186
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?