Paul Gordon v. Bonnie Draper

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Diana E. Murphy and Lavenski R. Smith (UNPUBLISHED) [4169687] [14-1233]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-1233 ___________________________ Paul M. Gordon lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Bonnie Lee Ann Draper lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________ Submitted: June 17, 2014 Filed: June 27, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 14-1233 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/27/2014 Entry ID: 4169687 Paul Gordon appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Bonnie Draper, a private person who has allegedly prevented Gordon’s mail from being delivered to his son, who lives with Draper. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000), we conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) because it failed to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted for the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Bryant’s Report and Recommendation. This is a merits dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, not a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank, Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 254 (2010). As so modified, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- Appellate Case: 14-1233 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/27/2014 Entry ID: 4169687

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?