Chickoiyah Miller, et al v. Weston Educational


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Duane Benton (PUBLISHED) [4460547] [14-1760]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court October 19, 2016 Mr. Matthew V. Bartle BARTLE & MARCUS Suite 2730 1100 Main Street Kansas City, MO 64105 RE: 14-1760 Chickoiyah Miller, et al v. Weston Educational Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD cc Mr. Charles Robinson Camp Mr. Matthew T. Geiger Mr. Steven Martin Gombos Mr. Gene P. Graham Jr. Mr. David Louis Marcus Mr. Michael Raab Mr. Gerald M. Ritzert Mr. Charles W. Scarborough Ms. Ann Thompson Mr. Bryan T. White Ms. Lucinda Sword Woolery Ms. Paige Wymore-Wynn District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:11-cv-00112-RK Appellate Case: 14-1760 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2016 Entry ID: 4460547

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?