Bulmaro Vasquez-Perez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4174979-2] petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez. [4253933] [14-2655]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2655
___________________________
Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: March 10, 2015
Filed: March 13, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s
decision to deny asylum and withholding of removal based on past persecution or a
well-founded fear of future persecution because of his membership in a particular
Appellate Case: 14-2655
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253933
social group. We have carefully considered the issues that are properly before us,1
see De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of
review), and we conclude, based on well-established precedent, that Vasquez-Perez
failed to show that the social group in which he claims membership is a particular
social group for purposes of asylum protection. See Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder, 662
F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
We do not review those rulings below that Vasquez-Perez does not
meaningfully challenge in his brief, nor do we review his new and unexhausted
contentions about particular social groups.
-2-
Appellate Case: 14-2655
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253933
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?