Bulmaro Vasquez-Perez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4174979-2] petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez. [4253933] [14-2655]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-2655 ___________________________ Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: March 10, 2015 Filed: March 13, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Bulmaro Amadeo Vasquez-Perez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s decision to deny asylum and withholding of removal based on past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution because of his membership in a particular Appellate Case: 14-2655 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253933 social group. We have carefully considered the issues that are properly before us,1 see De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review), and we conclude, based on well-established precedent, that Vasquez-Perez failed to show that the social group in which he claims membership is a particular social group for purposes of asylum protection. See Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder, 662 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 We do not review those rulings below that Vasquez-Perez does not meaningfully challenge in his brief, nor do we review his new and unexhausted contentions about particular social groups. -2- Appellate Case: 14-2655 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253933

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?